Understanding Google algorithms and updating timing of these algorithms helps web site managers and webmasters to better understand the changes made to Google's search engines on their site. In this article, we will become more familiar with the update of the Google algorithm in March 2019.
Data has confirmed why the Google update has reversed in March 2019
The results from the cirrhosis data marketing company have come up with reasons why the Google Core Update algorithm has reversed in March 2019. These data show why publishers think that this update, despite Google's report, is that this update is a big update.
The update of the Google core algorithm has reversed in March 2019
Bert Widdick, founder of Webmaster Word and Pabcone, had previously been given an update on the announcement. He was told that this update is the biggest update over the years.
When asked about his update about the update, he noted that the update has reversed the previous algorithms. He meant that he had received a lot of reports from fined websites that received traffic and SERP positions and said that the latest update has been reversed.
Why did the Google logo update fail in March 2019?
The data that Cyrtics needs is based on UK wins and losers. These are not US data. Nevertheless, this information provides insight into why Google's update is failing.
What's so interesting is that Cyrtics data shows that 75% of the winners are recent losers. That means that 75% of the websites that have been updated in this update have been sites that lost their rank in the 2018 updates.
Because many of the recent losers have been won, this update has reversed. I do not believe that Google has recovered in its updates. In the past, Stich engineers told me that Google's algorithm was fine-tuned.
I believe that they have improved the core updates of the site. I believe that this has already happened, and its side effects have also come up on sites that have recently lost their rank.
It may seem like a rebound, but it's highly unlikely. Every change that has come about is like a backlash.
True data from cirrhosis shows that 75% of sites that have been recovered by sites have been missing sites that have lost their rank in recent updates. This will make the new updates a recurrence.
Why the updates were very minor in March 2019
Cirrhic data has shown that sites that have been lost have lost the LONG TAIL positions, rather than large ones. This means that the amount of traffic that depends on the loss of the rank is less than the loss of more important traffic that represents more targeted web traffic.
This coincides with observations that said this update is not a major update.
Most of all, 70% of sites that have been lost are sites that have been affected by recent algorithms. If this data is correct and comparable to other countries, it means that most of the damage has suffered from sites that have lost their ranking. This may be something that shows that this update is not large either.
What is the March 2019 update?
There have been many improvements in data recovery technology last year, it's hard to point to one and say what's up. This update can be an extension or more than one extension.
For example, Google recently published a research paper titled Non-Humor Learning and Q and Repeat Quantities.
Correction of deviation in learning enhancement
This research article shows that there is deviation in learning to strengthen, which is a key area of ​​machine learning. I do not mean that Google has introduced a more precise version of machine learning or a version that reduces or removes errors or deviations. I have come up with a research article as an example of many research papers published by Google that may get a clue from what happened.
A communication signal for snoring
Another research paper shows a new way to browse web pages. This is called group learning privilege functions using deep neural networks.
This means that Web pages that are related to Query Source can sometimes override them according to what the user needs. Second, the history of user preferences shown on the results pages of the search engine (SERPs) can help to strengthen the relationship between documents.
Evolution of algorithms
I'm not saying that the research articles above are behind Google's recent updates. I show that the two recent advances must show what the newer ones are today. Many people still believe in 200 rootkits, and these updates are also the result of targeting low-quality sites. This is a misleading way of understanding Google updates.
As you can see from the two examples above, Google's algorithm is more complicated than 200 stringed signals.
Google's explanation of the March 2019 update
I expect Google to explain in the future what it's about. If this change is like a kind of algorithm, Google may be confused about what this algorithm is and what the results of this algorithm are.
Collecting observations about which sites is affected is a discussion. The conclusion of these observations often gives a poor attitude. They are referred to as medical observations because these observations have been affected in many relevant medical sites.
But the truth is that Google has not targeted medical sites. Unfortunately, these weak analyzes lead to confusion. The false idea that Google has targeted medical sites is still alive. This allows the conclusion to be based on limited observations. It is very bad that the name of the medical updates is given to it. This causes a lot of confusion.